<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Increase Shot Down: FHA Down Payment Remains 3.5%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fhaloanpros.com/2010/04/increase-shot-down-fha-down-payment-remains-35/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fhaloanpros.com/2010/04/increase-shot-down-fha-down-payment-remains-35/</link>
	<description>The Unofficial Guide to FHA Loans &#038; Mortgages</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 20:16:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob aubrey</title>
		<link>http://www.fhaloanpros.com/2010/04/increase-shot-down-fha-down-payment-remains-35/#comment-104515</link>
		<dc:creator>rob aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fhaloanpros.com/?p=2575#comment-104515</guid>
		<description>Brilliant I say, let&#039;s price buyers out of the market that will surely increase revenue to FHA.

I am just blown away by Gov bureaucrats, they clearly do not get how economics work. 

I don&#039;t disagree with the 580 10% thinking, although 10% might be to high. Maybe 5% and a bump in the UPMIF.

But if you are going to play that then how about rewarding the 740 and above crowd with a lessor down. They have demonstrated that they pay their bills, then may cause a lot more people to go that route. 

There&#039;s an idea causing more people with good credit, that might increase the revenue and at the same time decrease FHA&#039;s insurance payouts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant I say, let&#8217;s price buyers out of the market that will surely increase revenue to FHA.</p>
<p>I am just blown away by Gov bureaucrats, they clearly do not get how economics work. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t disagree with the 580 10% thinking, although 10% might be to high. Maybe 5% and a bump in the UPMIF.</p>
<p>But if you are going to play that then how about rewarding the 740 and above crowd with a lessor down. They have demonstrated that they pay their bills, then may cause a lot more people to go that route. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s an idea causing more people with good credit, that might increase the revenue and at the same time decrease FHA&#8217;s insurance payouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

