<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New FHA Worries: Are They Justified?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fhaloanpros.com/2010/03/2057/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fhaloanpros.com/2010/03/2057/</link>
	<description>The Unofficial Guide to FHA Loans &#038; Mortgages</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rob aubrey</title>
		<link>http://www.fhaloanpros.com/2010/03/2057/#comment-89507</link>
		<dc:creator>rob aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fhaloanpros.com/?p=2057#comment-89507</guid>
		<description>I've said it before and I'll say it again. The down payment was not the real culprit, it was the stated income loan.

Let's face it you could've bought a property with a 50% down payment, if you do not make enough to make the payments, then you have a problem.

If a borrower can prove their income and lives withing their means, no problem.

FHA needs to get it's head out of the sand and stop making new regulations, the old ones "when enforced" worked fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again. The down payment was not the real culprit, it was the stated income loan.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it you could&#8217;ve bought a property with a 50% down payment, if you do not make enough to make the payments, then you have a problem.</p>
<p>If a borrower can prove their income and lives withing their means, no problem.</p>
<p>FHA needs to get it&#8217;s head out of the sand and stop making new regulations, the old ones &#8220;when enforced&#8221; worked fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
