<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should We Bring Back FHA Seller-Financed Downpayments?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fhaloanpros.com/2010/01/should-we-bring-back-fha-seller-financed-downpayments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fhaloanpros.com/2010/01/should-we-bring-back-fha-seller-financed-downpayments/</link>
	<description>The Unofficial Guide to FHA Loans &#038; Mortgages</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 20:16:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: s2kreno</title>
		<link>http://www.fhaloanpros.com/2010/01/should-we-bring-back-fha-seller-financed-downpayments/#comment-79579</link>
		<dc:creator>s2kreno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fhaloanpros.com/?p=1750#comment-79579</guid>
		<description>Seller-paid DPAs should not back in my opinion. Homes purchased with seller-funded DPAs sold for 2-3% more than comparable houses, making them more likely to be underwater and more likely for borrowers to end up in default. Not everyone is suited for home ownership; if you don&#039;t have the discipline or wherewithal to come up with two or three percent for a down payment, your situation is too precarious and taxpayer&#039;s money should not be risked. A better solution is to require counseling, budgeting education, and set up accounts for disadvantaged people where they have to save their down payment plus two month&#039;s reserves and every dollar they put in can be matched by a community organization. That way only those willing to work for it get help with home ownership, and they&#039;d be better equipped to deal with the responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seller-paid DPAs should not back in my opinion. Homes purchased with seller-funded DPAs sold for 2-3% more than comparable houses, making them more likely to be underwater and more likely for borrowers to end up in default. Not everyone is suited for home ownership; if you don&#8217;t have the discipline or wherewithal to come up with two or three percent for a down payment, your situation is too precarious and taxpayer&#8217;s money should not be risked. A better solution is to require counseling, budgeting education, and set up accounts for disadvantaged people where they have to save their down payment plus two month&#8217;s reserves and every dollar they put in can be matched by a community organization. That way only those willing to work for it get help with home ownership, and they&#8217;d be better equipped to deal with the responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

